E-Posters-10096

10096_Escobar

Pdf Summary

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the use of simulation training to teach residents proper pessary fitting and management for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). A total of 25 resident physicians in Obstetrics and Gynecology were included in the study. They were randomized into control and intervention groups. <br /><br />All participants underwent a pre-test written examination and received a didactic lecture on pessary sizing and placement. The control group then completed a post-test written and practical examination on a life-size pelvic model, while the intervention group received a hands-on tutorial on a small-scale pelvic model prior to the post-test examination. <br /><br />The results showed no significant difference in immediate written or clinical examination scores between the two groups. The mean improvement from pre to post written test was similar in both groups. However, the satisfaction survey revealed that 80% of residents found the simulation training to be a valuable learning experience.<br /><br />The study concludes that while there was no significant difference in examination scores, the use of hands-on training improved resident satisfaction. The paucity of literature on resident education related to pessary management highlights the need for increased awareness and clinical skill in this field. <br /><br />This pilot study provides some insight into the effectiveness of simulation training for teaching residents pessary fitting and management. Further research is warranted to explore the long-term impact of this training method on resident performance and patient outcomes.

Keywords

simulation training

pessary fitting

pelvic organ prolapse

resident physicians

Obstetrics and Gynecology

control group

intervention group

pre-test written examination

hands-on tutorial

satisfaction survey